Argument |
---|
Argument is a type of discourse that attempts
to convince an audience by means of logical reasoning that a particular
claim is true. Logical reasoning is usually composed of syllogisms that are
either directly or indirectly expressed. In formal logic, syllogistic
reasoning consists of a major premise (“Every registered citizen eighteen
or over is eligible to vote”); a minor premise (“Elizabeth is an
eighteen-year-old registered citizen”); and a conclusion (“Therefore,
Elizabeth is eligible to vote”). The formula is usually: “All P is Q”;
“R is P”; “Therefore, R is Q.”
A well-constructed syllogism leads to a
necessary conclusion. But even though the conclusion may be valid (it
logically follows from the premises), it is not necessarily factually correct
or true. For example, someone may argue: “In Nevada any resident ten years
of age or over can obtain a driver’s permit,” and “Since Bruce is a
ten-year-old Nevada resident, he can obtain a permit to drive.” The
conclusion would be valid but true only if the major premise were true,
which it (fortunately) is not. Many of our every day arguments are
constructed from major premises that require proof or verification or are
merely assertions of opinion. Thus, someone who starts with the premise
“Cloning a human being is morally wrong” could arrive at all kinds of valid
conclusions (for example, that such and such a scientist or laboratory is
unethical, that grants for cloning research should be prohibited). But the
starting premise here is only an assertion of opinion that itself requires
proof. In most discourse, syllogisms are not expressed directly in the
rigid structure just outlined, but rather more casually, often with
premises or conclusions implied. An audience’s task in evaluating an
argument usually entails reconstructing the latent syllogism by supplying the
missing portions to make sure the conclusion really does follow from the
premises.
Copyright 2002
Atwan, Robert. Convergences. Boston:Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2002.